US’ intelligence-related strategy hypes ‘China threat’ narrative to provoke camp opposition
Wire desk byline Sourced from Xinhua, Dawn, Arab News, Anadolu and Minute Mirror. Translated and abridged by the GSRRA Desk.
The US’ newly approved strategy hyping the intelligence threat from China and Russia is an old trick by Washington attempting to provoke camp opposition in the Asia-Pacific region, serving its plan to implement unilateralism and hegemonism in the region, which will only bring insecurity and instability to the international community, Chinese experts said on Friday.
According to VOA, US President Joe Biden signed on Thursday a new strategy claiming Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea as the “main culprits” that caused the US to face “a series of unprecedented threats from foreign intelligence agencies.”
The strategy also claimed that Moscow and Beijing are “the most significant intelligence threats,” and hyped that they are increasingly cooperating “to undermine the US.”
The US’ aggressive smearing of countries in the Asia-Pacific is a deliberate attempt to create divisions and foster hostility in the region, Chinese experts said.
“By painting China and Russia as adversaries, the US is seeking to create the formation of opposing camps in the Asia-Pacific region,” Lü Chao, dean of the Institute of American and East Asian Studies at Liaoning University and a research fellow at the Charhar Institute, told the Global Times on Friday.
It has been the consistent practice of the US to stigmatize China to tarnish its international reputation, Lü said, noting that this is aimed at serving Washington’s unilateral hegemonism in the Asia-Pacific region. However, Lü warned that such actions will only bring serious insecurity and instability to the international community.
When asked about the US hyping of the bilateral cooperation between China and Russia, Lü emphasized that these partnerships are conducted with a focus on mutual benefit and are never targeted at a third party. Despite this, the US continues to take a provocative attitude toward China-Russia cooperation and is also trying to sabotage the coordination between other countries and China and Russia.
The US reliance on spreading disinformation to sow discord and conduct provocation is a futile endeavor that is destined to fail, analysts said.
Experts also noted that the US hype has significantly eroded the bedrock of mutual trust in China-US relations. Both sides stand to benefit from cooperation and lose from confrontation, but the US continues to wantonly smear China, constantly exaggerating the bilateral relationship as being a hostile one, Lü said.
The US must rationally approach its interactions with China and avoid crossing red lines. China will resolutely fight back if any further provocative actions are taken by the US, experts said.
Source:- https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202408/1317270.shtml
Zamir Ahmed Awan is the founder and Chair of the Global Silk Route Research Alliance, a think tank in Islamabad. He studied engineering at Shanghai University in the 1980s, and years later he went back to China as Pakistan's science counsellor in Beijing, from 2010 until 2016, working on science and higher education cooperation between the two countries.…
Usually I do not read article on blogs however I would like to say that this writeup very compelled me to take a look at and do it Your writing style has been amazed me Thank you very nice article
Your blog is a treasure trove of valuable insights and thought-provoking commentary. Your dedication to your craft is evident in every word you write. Keep up the fantastic work!
Hello my loved one I want to say that this post is amazing great written and include almost all significant infos I would like to look extra posts like this
Fantastic beat I would like to apprentice while you amend your web site how could i subscribe for a blog site The account helped me a acceptable deal I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept
The degree to which I appreciate your creations is equal to your own sentiment. Your sketch is tasteful, and the authored material is stylish. Yet, you seem uneasy about the prospect of embarking on something that may cause unease. I agree that you’ll be able to address this matter efficiently.