（下边有中文翻译请继续看到底。 谢谢。）
Pakistan’s willingness to review the Simla Agreement, call for international investigations, and stand firm against Indian aggression is not a threat, but a responsible response. 巴基斯坦愿意审查《西姆拉协定》，呼吁进行国际调查，坚决反对印度的侵略，这不是威胁，而是负责任的回应。
In the shadow of rising tensions between India and Pakistan, the relevance and future of the Simla Agreement have come under increasing scrutiny. Signed on July 2, 1972, in the aftermath of the 1971 India-Pakistan war, the Simla Agreement was hailed as a diplomatic milestone. It aimed to chart a path towards peaceful coexistence and mutual resolution of disputes, particularly the long-standing issue of Jammu and Kashmir, through bilateral negotiations and respect for the Line of Control (LoC).
Yet, over five decades later, Pakistan has every reason to question the credibility of this pact. India’s repeated violations of both the spirit and letter of the Simla Agreement—through unilateral actions, military escalations, and suppression in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir—have rendered the agreement increasingly hollow. The recent Pahalgam incident, blamed squarely and baselessly on Pakistan, is only the latest in a long series of provocations.
Background of the Simla Agreement
The Simla Agreement was born out of the ashes of war. Following the dismemberment of Pakistan in 1971 and the creation of Bangladesh, the agreement was signed between Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto of Pakistan and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India. It laid down key principles:
· Peaceful resolution of disputes through bilateral negotiations.
· No unilateral change in the status of the LoC.
· Respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference.
But India has continually used the agreement as a shield to resist international mediation on Kashmir, while itself violating its essence by unilaterally changing the constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019, when Article 370 was revoked.
Pakistan’s Rightful Warning: Reassessing a Broken Pact
Pakistan’s repeated warnings about potentially suspending or revisiting the Simla Agreement are not driven by aggression but by disillusionment. If India treats bilateral pacts as tools of convenience rather than instruments of commitment, how can Pakistan be expected to honor them blindly?
Suspending the Simla Agreement would signal that Pakistan no longer accepts India’s arbitrary use of the bilateral framework to prevent third-party mediation while simultaneously destabilizing the region. It would open avenues for international arbitration, bringing global focus back to the Kashmir dispute—a legitimate and longstanding issue central to regional peace.
Consequences and Strategic Realities
India’s strategic community fears the internationalization of Kashmir, and rightly so. A unilateral Pakistani move to suspend the Simla Agreement could:
· Reignite international pressure on India, particularly from neutral countries that believe in justice and the rule of law.
· Revive UN mechanisms previously shelved due to the so-called “bilateral understanding.”
· Expose India’s duplicity in rejecting outside mediation while fueling instability through harsh domestic policies and false narratives.
The Pahalgam Incident: A False-Flag Operation Exposed
The Pahalgam incident, wherein Indian security forces suffered casualties in what was claimed to be a “cross-border terror attack,” appears to be a manufactured false flag operation staged by India itself. Without offering evidence or investigation, India hurriedly blamed Pakistan, escalating military rhetoric and threatening punitive action. But the truth is more complex—and sinister.
Pakistan categorically rejected any involvement in the incident. In fact, Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif offered to facilitate a neutral international investigation, inviting organizations like the United Nations or the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to supervise the probe. India’s refusal to accept a neutral inquiry strongly suggests that it has something to hide. This reflects a disturbing pattern of provoking conflict, demonizing Pakistan, and manipulating public opinion for domestic political gains.
India’s Aggression: A Threat to Regional Peace
India’s hostile posture towards Pakistan is visible not only in the military domain but also in economic warfare. Attempts to deprive Pakistan of its legitimate share of water under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a World Bank-brokered agreement, constitute a clear violation of international law. India’s actions could destabilize agriculture and water security in Pakistan, affecting over 220 million people.
Moreover, India’s use of disinformation, economic coercion, and diplomatic bullying to isolate Pakistan belies its claim of being a responsible regional actor. Whether it’s brutal suppression of Kashmiris, refusal to engage in dialogue, or misinformation campaigns targeting Pakistan, India’s record is clear and troubling.
Pakistan: A Pillar of Peace in a Volatile Region
Amid these provocations, Pakistan has demonstrated remarkable restraint and maturity. Its strategic calculus is not war, but peace. It seeks sustainable development, regional integration, and mutually beneficial ties, not conflict.
Pakistan has consistently advocated for dialogue and diplomacy. Whether through backchannel talks, confidence-building measures, or participation in international forums, Pakistan has made its intentions clear: We want peace, not war. However, peace cannot be one-sided.
When India uses diplomacy as a smokescreen to fuel tensions, Pakistan is justified in adopting countermeasures, whether diplomatic, legal, or military, to safeguard its sovereignty and national interest.
A Call to the International Community
India’s repeated provocations and warmongering threaten not only Pakistan but also the larger dream of regional peace and stability in South Asia. The world must not turn a blind eye to the rising threat of conflict. The United Nations, human rights watchdogs, and global powers must step up and recognize that South Asia stands on a dangerous precipice.
Pakistan’s call for a neutral probe into the Pahalgam incident, its adherence to international agreements, and its unwavering commitment to peace all stand in stark contrast to India’s aggression, manipulation, and intransigence.
Let the World Judge Fairly
It is time the world sees the truth behind India’s carefully crafted image. Behind its claims of democracy and diplomacy lies a belligerent power intent on hegemony. Pakistan, by contrast, seeks a future where justice, peace, and mutual respect define inter-state relations.
Pakistan’s willingness to review the Simla Agreement, call for international investigations, and stand firm against Indian aggression is not a threat—it is a responsible response rooted in the values of peace, fairness, and regional stability.
Let the global community stand with the truth. Let justice prevail, and let South Asia move towards a future of hope rather than hostility.
在印度和巴基斯坦之间日益紧张的阴影下，《西姆拉协议》的相关性和未来受到越来越多的审视。1971年印巴战争结束后，1972年7月2日签署的《西姆拉协定》被誉为外交上的里程碑。它旨在通过双边谈判和尊重控制线，开辟一条通往和平共处和相互解决争端的道路，特别是长期存在的查谟和克什米尔问题。
然而，50多年后的今天，巴基斯坦完全有理由质疑这一协议的可信度。印度一再违反《西姆拉协定》的精神和文字- -通过单方面行动、军事升级和在印占查谟和克什米尔的镇压- -使该协定越来越空洞。最近发生的巴哈尔甘事件，毫无根据地直接归咎于巴基斯坦，这只是巴基斯坦长期以来一系列挑衅行为中的最新一次。
Simla协议的背景
《西姆拉协定》诞生于战争的灰烬之中。在1971年巴基斯坦被肢解和孟加拉国成立之后，巴基斯坦总理佐勒菲卡尔·阿里·布托和印度总理英迪拉·甘地签署了这项协议。它规定了主要原则：
·通过双边谈判和平解决争端。
·控制线状态没有单方面改变。
·尊重主权、领土完整和不干涉内政。
但印度一直以该协议为挡泥石，抵制国际社会就克什米尔问题进行调解，同时在2019年8月单方面改变查谟和克什米尔的宪法地位，废除了第370条，违反了协议的本质。
巴基斯坦的正确警告：重新评估一个破裂的协议
巴基斯坦一再警告可能暂停或重新审议《西姆拉协定》，其动机不是侵略，而是幻想破灭。如果印度把双边协议当作便利的工具，而不是承诺的工具，怎么能指望巴基斯坦盲目地遵守这些协议呢？
暂停《西姆拉协定》将表明，巴基斯坦不再接受印度任意利用双边框架来阻止第三方调解，同时破坏该地区的稳定。这将打开国际仲裁的大门，将全球的焦点拉回到克什米尔争端——一个对地区和平至关重要的合法且长期存在的问题上。
后果和战略现实
印度的战略界担心克什米尔的国际化，这是正确的。巴基斯坦单方面中止《西姆拉协定》可能：
·重新点燃对印度的国际压力，特别是来自相信正义和法治的中立国家的压力。
·恢复因所谓“双边谅解”而被搁置的联合国机制。
·揭露印度的口是心非，一方面拒绝外部调解，另一方面又通过严厉的国内政策和虚假的叙述加剧不稳定。
帕哈尔甘事件：揭露假旗行动
在巴哈尔甘事件中，印度安全部队在所谓的“跨境恐怖袭击”中伤亡，这似乎是印度自己制造的假旗行动。在没有提供证据或调查的情况下，印度匆忙指责巴基斯坦，升级军事言论并威胁采取惩罚行动。但事实更加复杂和险恶。
巴基斯坦断然拒绝参与这一事件。巴基斯坦总理沙赫巴兹·谢里夫（Shahbaz Sharif）表示，愿意促成一个中立的国际调查，邀请联合国或伊斯兰合作组织（OIC）等组织监督调查。印度拒绝接受一项中立的调查，这强烈表明它有所隐瞒。这反映了一种令人不安的挑起冲突、妖魔化巴基斯坦和操纵公众舆论以获得国内政治利益的模式。
印度的侵略：对地区和平的威胁
印度对巴基斯坦的敌对姿态不仅体现在军事领域，也体现在经济战中。试图剥夺巴基斯坦在《印度河水域条约》（IWT）下的合法用水份额，这是世界银行促成的协议，显然违反了国际法。印度的行动可能会破坏巴基斯坦的农业和水安全，影响到2.2亿多人。
此外，印度利用虚假信息、经济胁迫和外交欺凌来孤立巴基斯坦，这与它声称自己是一个负责任的地区行动者的说法不符。无论是对克什米尔人的残酷镇压，拒绝参与对话，还是针对巴基斯坦的虚假宣传，印度的记录都是清晰而令人不安的。
巴基斯坦：动荡地区的和平支柱
在这些挑衅中，巴基斯坦表现出了非凡的克制和成熟。它的战略考量不是战争，而是和平。它寻求可持续发展、区域一体化和互利关系，而不是冲突。
巴基斯坦一贯主张对话和外交。无论是通过秘密谈判、建立信任措施，还是参与国际论坛，巴基斯坦都表明了自己的意图：我们要和平，不要战争。然而，和平不能是单方面的。
当印度利用外交作为烟幕来加剧紧张局势时，巴基斯坦有理由采取外交、法律或军事上的反制措施，以维护其主权和国家利益。
对国际社会的呼吁
印度的一再挑衅和好战行为不仅威胁到巴基斯坦，也威胁到南亚地区和平与稳定的更大梦想。世界绝不能对不断上升的冲突威胁视而不见。联合国、人权监督机构和全球大国必须加紧行动，认识到南亚正站在危险的悬崖上。
巴基斯坦呼吁对巴哈尔甘事件进行中立调查，遵守国际协议，坚定不移地致力于和平，这些都与印度的侵略、操纵和不妥协形成鲜明对比。
让世界公正地评判吧
是时候让世界看清印度精心打造的形象背后的真相了。在其民主和外交主张的背后，是一个企图称霸的好战大国。相比之下，巴基斯坦寻求的是一个正义、和平和相互尊重界定国家间关系的未来。
巴基斯坦愿意重新审视《西姆拉协议》，呼吁进行国际调查，并坚决反对印度的侵略，这不是一种威胁，而是一种基于和平、公平和地区稳定价值观的负责任的回应。
让国际社会与真相站在一起。让正义占上风，让南亚走向一个充满希望而不是充满敌意的未来。
( 注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)
Reference Link:- https://southasia.com.pk/2025/05/30/simla-disagreement/