It is time for India to stop its bullying tactics and step up as a responsible nation in South Asia.
From May 7 to May 10, a military conflict between India and Pakistan ignited a fresh debate among security analysts and scholars. This confrontation represented the first occurrence of warfare that integrated tactics from 5th and 6th generation warfare. On the Indian side, there was a strong focus on tactics such as deception, misinformation, fake news, propaganda, and psychological disruption, alongside traditional kinetic force. Meanwhile, Pakistan employed kinetic and non-kinetic military strategies, including social engineering, electronic warfare, and cyberwarfare, while also leveraging cutting-edge technologies like AI and autonomous systems.
In response to the escalating military provocations, India’s reaction to Pakistan’s strike on May 10 has often been described as subdued. This reaction has led to a deeper analysis of India’s national security and defence strategies, with scholars and analysts closely scrutinizing how India is handling rising tensions with Pakistan. The mention of Pakistan’s assertive military posture highlights that Pakistan often adopts aggressive tactics to challenge India’s influence and security in the region. The text suggests that India’s approach is under significant scrutiny, particularly in light of this recent incident and the historical context of military interactions between the two nations. Analysts are exploring whether India’s measured response is an effective strategy or if it necessitates a re-evaluation in the face of ongoing provocations from Pakistan.
The perceived inadequacy of India’s response has sparked a debate about its broader strategic objectives. Some experts argue that India’s restraint is a calculated move aimed at avoiding further escalation, contributing to regional stability, and reducing the risk of conflict. Conversely, other analysts suggest that this strategy may inadvertently embolden adversarial states and weaken India’s influence within the South Asian geopolitical landscape. As Pakistan employs various tactics—such as border skirmishes, infiltration, and both land and cyber warfare—India faces the challenge of crafting an effective response that balances diplomatic relations and global partnerships. The complexity of regional geopolitics calls for a nuanced approach that recognizes the interdependencies and intricacies of the situation.
Domestic factors are likely to influence India’s strategic direction, as the positions of political parties and public opinion play vital roles in shaping responses to external threats. In this context, it becomes crucial for India to navigate its security challenges while projecting a strong national image. International perspectives on India’s security responses are also significant, particularly since global powers have a vested interest in India effectively countering the rising influence of China. The effectiveness of India’s alliances, partnerships, and diplomatic efforts will be key in determining how it addresses Pakistan’s actions while striving to establish itself as a regional leader. However, can India act as a regional hegemon after its defeat in Operation Bunyan-um Marsoos? Will global powers continue to view India as a strategic partner in countering China?
According to credible internal sources, a significant shift occurred behind closed doors in New Delhi following the precision strikes conducted by Pakistan on the 10th of May. When Prime Minister Narendra Modi consulted with his senior ministers and advisors in response to Pakistan’s actions, it became clear that India could not match the strength, discipline, and tactical expertise of the Pakistani Armed Forces. This moment marks a critical turning point in the region’s balance of power, highlighting the strength, professionalism, and formidable deterrence of Pakistan’s Army and Air Force. These achievements are also rooted in the legacy of leadership established by figures like General Musharraf, as well as the strategic insights of General Khalid Kidwai and General Bilal, whose foresight and planning have played vital roles behind the scenes.
Confronted with significant losses and the imminent risk of further devastation, Indian leadership reportedly recognized their inability to counter Pakistan’s strong response effectively. In a climate of panic and urgency, India allegedly reached out to key global powers through diplomatic and intelligence backchannels, urgently requesting intervention to de-escalate the situation.
The strength and precision demonstrated by the Pakistan Armed Forces sent a clear and powerful message: Pakistan will not tolerate aggression in the region and seeks peace and stability in South Asia.
Although there was no formal admission, India’s actions spoke volumes. Essentially, the country acknowledged its defeat, not through public declarations, but through a quiet withdrawal. Recognizing the extent of the damage incurred and the risk of further humiliation, Indian leadership began urgent behind-the-scenes efforts to secure a ceasefire. They sought assistance from friendly nations to mediate and stabilize the situation, leveraging their international alliances. At this critical moment, global powers, including the United States, intervened by offering India a diplomatic path to avoid further embarrassment and destruction at the hands of a determined Pakistan. This was not merely a diplomatic effort; it was, in effect, a covert surrender. This situation highlights a significant shift in power dynamics, prompting India to reassess its defence strategies. India must thoroughly evaluate its military policy in response to Pakistan’s calculated actions; remaining passive could jeopardize its sovereignty and influence in the region. The evolving landscape of military provocations and India’s strategic responses will be crucial in determining the future of security and stability in South Asia. This context raises important questions about balancing restraint with decisive action when faced with aggressive external threats!
The strength and precision demonstrated by the Pakistan Armed Forces sent a clear and powerful message: Pakistan will not tolerate aggression in the region and seeks peace and stability in South Asia. If India attempts to act as a bully in South Asia, Pakistan will respond with its military might. The country has the determination and capability to defend every inch of its territory with unwavering resolve. The psychological and strategic impact of Pakistan’s response was so significant that even a militarily ambitious adversary like India was compelled to retreat, not by choice, but out of sheer necessity. It’s time for India to stop its bullying tactics in South Asia and step up as a responsible nation. Embracing its role in fostering peace and stability is the only way forward for the region. The path to a brighter future lies in cooperation and respect—India must rise to the occasion and lead by example. The stakes are too high for anything less.
Author: The writer, Dr. Fara Naz, is associated with the National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad as an Assistant Professor at Department of Government and Public Policy.
Publisher is not liable for the contents of the article. It is purely opinion of the author.
Reference Link:- https://southasia.com.pk/2025/05/30/unspoken-retreat/