（下边有中文翻译请继续看到底。 谢谢。）
Indian subcontinent stands once again on the brink of a grave crisis, one that could jeopardize regional peace and global stability. In a reckless act of aggression, Indian fighter jets violated Pakistan’s airspace and bombarded multiple locations inside Pakistani territory. Initial reports confirm at least 26 civilian casualties, many of whom were women, children, and infants. Dozens more lie critically injured, and the death toll is expected to rise.
This blatant act of war is not only a breach of international law but also a reflection of the immaturity and expansionist mindset that currently governs Indian policy. India’s military incursion was not provoked by any credible threat, nor did it serve any defensive purpose. Instead, it was driven by a desire to distract the Indian public from internal failures, whip up jingoistic sentiments, and assert regional dominance.
The False Flag Drama of Pahalgam
India’s actions were prefaced by a hastily constructed narrative of a false flag operation in Pahalgam, which it blamed on Pakistan without offering any verifiable evidence. The world has seen such theatrics before—incidents conveniently timed ahead of Indian elections or to overshadow domestic failures in governance, economy, and social cohesion. However, this time the international community did not buy into New Delhi’s baseless claims.
Prominent global voices, including the United Nations, European Union, and leading international human rights organizations, have called for an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into the Pahalgam incident. These actors emphasized the importance of evidence-based conclusions rather than hasty accusations that can escalate tensions between two nuclear-armed states.
India’s attempt to create a false narrative and use it as a justification for cross-border military aggression has not only failed but backfired. Its credibility on the global stage has eroded further, while Pakistan’s calls for calm, dialogue, and due process have gained broad international support.
The Global Reaction: Restraint Over Recklessness
The world has taken serious note of India’s dangerous actions. Multiple countries and international forums have expressed deep concern over the unprovoked aggression and have urged both nations to show restraint. Importantly, the tone of these statements makes it evident that India is being seen as the instigator.
The United Nations Secretary-General has called upon India to de-escalate and resolve all disputes through peaceful dialogue as per the UN Charter. China, Russia, Turkey, and even key voices in the European Union have reaffirmed Pakistan’s right to territorial integrity and supported its call for a diplomatic resolution.
India’s war rhetoric is being viewed with increasing alarm. As two nuclear-armed neighbors face off, the risk of miscalculation could lead to catastrophic consequences not only for South Asia but the entire world. The United Nations and responsible global powers recognize this and have endorsed Pakistan’s appeal for international mediation and conflict de-escalation.
Nuclear Brinkmanship: A Global Threat
The current crisis is not a bilateral matter alone. With India and Pakistan both possessing nuclear weapons, any escalation beyond conventional warfare would have region-wide and possibly global repercussions. According to recent reports from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), both countries maintain sophisticated nuclear arsenals, including second-strike capabilities.
Experts estimate that a full-scale nuclear conflict between the two nations could kill tens of millions within hours and trigger a global climate catastrophe. Even a limited nuclear exchange would generate sufficient atmospheric soot to cool global temperatures and devastate agriculture worldwide. The stakes are too high to be left in the hands of an aggressive and impulsive regime in New Delhi.
Pakistan: A Mature and Responsible Actor
In contrast, Pakistan has exhibited maturity, responsibility, and unwavering commitment to peace. Despite suffering the loss of innocent lives and violation of its sovereignty, Pakistan’s leadership has acted with restraint. Rather than retaliate immediately and escalate the conflict, Islamabad chose to take the high road—appealing to the global conscience and engaging international mechanisms for peace.
Pakistan has repeatedly stated its willingness to resolve all disputes with India, including the long-standing issue of Jammu & Kashmir, through political and diplomatic means. Prime Minister and military leadership alike have emphasized that dialogue—not war—is the only viable path forward.
This posture should not be mistaken for weakness. Pakistan reserves the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter and will respond appropriately if aggression continues. The timing, location, and method of response will be Pakistan’s sovereign decision. But for now, Pakistan’s conduct exemplifies the maturity of a nation that understands the costs of war and values peace.
Historical Context: A Pattern of Indian Aggression
India’s current aggression is not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of expansionist behavior and regional bullying. From its annexation of Kashmir in August 2019—revoking Article 370 and violating UN Security Council resolutions—to its aggressive posturing against China, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, India has increasingly acted as a destabilizing force in South Asia.
Within India itself, the rise of Hindu nationalism and anti-Muslim policies under the BJP government have polarized society. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the National Register of Citizens (NRC), and abrogation of Kashmir’s special status are all examples of how India’s internal ideological extremism is spilling over into its foreign policy.
Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership, India has transformed from a secular republic into an assertive, ideologically driven state that views dissent and diplomacy as weaknesses. This trajectory poses a threat not only to Pakistan but to every neighbor in the region.
International Alignment with Pakistan’s Narrative
Unlike previous crises, the global response to the current situation reflects a marked shift in tone. Pakistan’s diplomatic outreach has paid off. The narrative being accepted by the international community is one of balance, investigation, and restraint—not blind support for Indian claims.
Think tanks across Europe and the United States have urged their governments to press India to de-escalate. Editorials in major newspapers such as The Guardian, Le Monde, and The New York Times have questioned the credibility of India’s allegations and praised Pakistan’s responsible behavior.
Even in multilateral forums, there is a growing consensus that India must be held accountable for its recent aggression and provocations. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has unequivocally condemned Indian actions and expressed solidarity with the people of Pakistan.
A Call to Action for the Global Community
The international community must move beyond words and take concrete action to prevent a catastrophe. Key global powers should demand:
- Immediate cessation of hostilities by India.
- An impartial international investigation into the Pahalgam incident.
- Revival of dialogue mechanisms between India and Pakistan under UN supervision.
- Reaffirmation of Kashmir’s disputed status, and the initiation of peaceful resolution efforts as per UN resolutions.
- Sanctions or diplomatic consequences for further Indian aggression.
It is in no one’s interest for South Asia to become a nuclear flashpoint. But so long as India continues its reckless course, the threat remains very real.
Standing Firm, Standing for Peace
Pakistan stands at a critical juncture—not just for itself, but for the region and the world. In the face of unprovoked aggression, it has chosen diplomacy over destruction, principle over provocation, and responsibility over recklessness.
However, this commitment to peace should not be misread. Pakistan has the will, the strength, and the means to defend itself. If war is imposed, it will respond with full force and fight with resolve until justice and peace are restored.
Let this moment be a test of the world’s conscience. Let it not repeat the mistake of appeasing aggressors. The time for neutrality has passed. The global community must now stand clearly on the side of international law, regional peace, and human dignity. It must stand with Pakistan.
印度次大陆再次站在严重危机的边缘，这场危机可能危及区域和平与全球稳定。在鲁莽的侵略行为中，印度战斗机侵犯了巴基斯坦领空，轰炸了巴基斯坦境内的多个地点。初步报告证实至少有26名平民伤亡，其中许多是妇女、儿童和婴儿。还有数十人受重伤，死亡人数预计还会上升。
这种明目张胆的战争行为不仅违反了国际法，而且反映了目前支配印度政策的不成熟和扩张主义思维。印度的军事入侵不是由任何可信的威胁挑起的，也没有任何防御目的。相反，它的动机是分散印度公众对内部失败的注意力，煽动沙文主义情绪，并维护地区主导地位。
巴哈甘的伪旗戏剧
印度的行动以匆忙编造的在巴哈尔甘的一次假旗行动作为开头，并在没有提供任何可证实的证据的情况下将其归咎于巴基斯坦。世界上以前就见过这样的戏剧性事件——在印度大选之前发生的事件，或者掩盖了国内在治理、经济和社会凝聚力方面的失败。然而，这一次国际社会没有接受新德里毫无根据的说法。
包括联合国、欧盟和主要国际人权组织在内的全球知名人士呼吁对巴哈尔甘事件进行独立、公正和透明的调查。这些行为体强调了基于证据的结论的重要性，而不是可能加剧两个核国家之间紧张关系的草率指控。
印度试图制造一种虚假的叙述，并以此作为跨境军事侵略的理由，这不仅失败了，而且适得其反。它在国际舞台上的信誉进一步受损，而巴基斯坦对冷静、对话和正当程序的呼吁得到了广泛的国际支持。
全球反应：克制而非鲁莽
世界已经严肃地注意到印度的危险行动。多个国家和国际论坛对这一无端侵略表示深切关注，并敦促两国表现出克制。重要的是，这些声明的语气表明，印度显然被视为煽动者。
联合国秘书长呼吁印度根据《联合国宪章》，通过和平对话化解争端。中国、俄罗斯、土耳其，甚至欧盟的主要声音都重申了巴基斯坦的领土完整权，并支持其通过外交途径解决的呼吁。
印度的战争言论正受到越来越多的关注。当两个拥有核武器的邻国对峙时，误判的风险不仅会给南亚，而且会给整个世界带来灾难性的后果。联合国和负责任的全球大国认识到这一点，并赞同巴基斯坦关于国际调解和冲突降级的呼吁。
核边缘政策：全球威胁
当前的危机不仅仅是双边问题。由于印度和巴基斯坦都拥有核武器，任何超出常规战争的升级都将在整个地区乃至全球产生影响。根据斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所（SIPRI）最近的报告，两国都拥有先进的核武库，包括二次打击能力。
专家估计，两国之间的全面核冲突可能会在数小时内造成数千万人死亡，并引发全球气候灾难。即使是有限的核交换也会产生足够的大气烟尘，使全球气温下降，并摧毁全世界的农业。赌注太大，不能让好斗、冲动的新德里政权来掌控。
巴基斯坦：一个成熟和负责任的行动者
相比之下，巴基斯坦表现出成熟、负责任和对和平的坚定承诺。尽管无辜的生命受到损失，巴基斯坦的主权受到侵犯，但巴基斯坦领导人采取了克制的行动。伊斯兰堡没有立即采取报复行动，使冲突升级，而是选择了走正道——呼吁全球良知，参与国际和平机制。
巴基斯坦一再表示愿意通过政治和外交手段解决与印度的所有争端，包括长期存在的查谟和克什米尔问题。总理和军方领导人都强调，对话，而不是战争，是唯一可行的前进道路。
这个姿势不应该被误认为是软弱。巴基斯坦保留根据《联合国宪章》第五十一条进行自卫的权利，如果侵略继续，巴基斯坦将作出适当的反应。反应的时间、地点和方式将是巴基斯坦的主权决定。但就目前而言，巴基斯坦的行为体现了一个国家的成熟，它明白战争的代价，重视和平。
历史背景：印度侵略的模式
印度目前的侵略不是一个孤立事件，而是其扩张主义行为和地区欺凌模式的一部分。
在印度国内，印度教民族主义的兴起和人民党政府的反穆斯林政策使社会两极分化。《公民身份修正法案》（CAA）、《国家公民登记册》（NRC）以及废除克什米尔的特殊地位，都是印度内部意识形态极端主义如何蔓延到其外交政策中的例子。
在总理纳伦德拉·莫迪（Narendra Modi）的领导下，印度已从一个世俗的共和国转变为一个自信的、意识形态驱动的国家，将异见和外交视为弱点。这一轨迹不仅对巴基斯坦构成威胁，而且对该地区的每一个邻国都构成威胁。
国际社会认同巴基斯坦的说法
与以往的危机不同，全球对当前形势的反应反映出基调的明显转变。巴基斯坦的外交努力取得了成效。国际社会所接受的说法是平衡、调查和克制，而不是盲目支持印度的主张。
欧洲和美国的智库都敦促本国政府向印度施压，要求其缓和紧张局势。《卫报》、《世界报》和《纽约时报》等主要报纸的社论质疑印度指控的可信度，并赞扬巴基斯坦负责任的行为。
即使在多边论坛上，也有越来越多的共识认为，印度必须为其最近的侵略和挑衅负责。伊斯兰合作组织（伊斯兰会议组织）毫不含糊地谴责印度的行动，并对巴基斯坦人民表示声援。
呼吁全球社会采取行动
国际社会必须超越言辞，采取具体行动来防止灾难的发生。全球主要大国应提出以下要求：
印度立即停止敌对行动。
对巴哈尔甘事件进行公正的国际调查。
在联合国监督下恢复印度和巴基斯坦之间的对话机制。
重申克什米尔有争议的地位，并根据联合国决议启动和平解决努力。
对印度进一步侵略的制裁或外交后果。
南亚成为核爆点不符合任何人的利益。但只要印度继续其不计后果的路线，威胁就依然存在。
坚定立场，捍卫和平
巴基斯坦正处在一个关键时刻——不仅对它自己，而且对该地区和世界。面对无端的侵略，中国选择了外交而不是破坏，选择了原则而不是挑衅，选择了责任而不是鲁莽。
然而，这种对和平的承诺不应被误读。巴基斯坦有保卫自己的意志、力量和手段。如果战争被强加，它将全力回应，坚决战斗，直到恢复正义与和平。
让这一刻成为对世界良知的一次考验。不要重蹈姑息侵略者的覆辙。保持中立的时代已经过去。国际社会现在必须明确地站在国际法、区域和平和人类尊严的一边。
( 注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)
Reference Link:- https://minutemirror.com.pk/indian-aggression-and-the-specter-of-war-pakistans-call-for-peace-and-global-responsibility-391146/