Modi’s war-craze: China’s Crucial Role in Averting Disaster in South-Asia. 莫迪的战争狂热：中国在南亚避免灾难中的关键作用.

（下边有中文翻译请继续看到底。 谢谢。）

The recent surge in tensions between India and Pakistan following the tragic Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 people, has reignited long-standing concerns over India’s aggressive posturing, its pattern of false flag operations, and its dangerous slide toward extremism under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While the global community calls for restraint and impartial investigation, New Delhi appears determined to exploit the incident as a pretext to escalate hostilities with Pakistan. This calculated move not only destabilizes South Asia but also poses a grave threat to global peace and security.

India’s History of False Flag Operations

India’s current claims against Pakistan in connection with the Pahalgam attack are not new. The country has a documented history of using false flag operations to justify aggressive action. The most notorious example is the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, which was immediately blamed on Pakistan-backed groups, despite several inconsistencies and unanswered questions. Similarly, the 2008 Mumbai attacks were used to exert diplomatic pressure on Pakistan, yet serious questions linger regarding internal lapses and the convenient scapegoating of Pakistan.

In 2016, India claimed to have conducted “surgical strikes” across the Line of Control in response to an alleged militant attack in Uri. No independent verification was ever provided, and Pakistan denied any such incursion took place. Again in 2019, India carried out an airstrike in Balakot following the Pulwama attack. The Indian media celebrated the mission as a grand success, but independent satellite imagery and on-ground reports indicated the attack caused no significant damage—except to a few trees.

These events are consistent with a pattern: a high-profile attack takes place, Pakistan is immediately blamed without credible investigation, and India responds militarily or diplomatically to project strength domestically. The cycle repeats, strengthening the ruling party’s nationalist credentials while sidestepping real issues like governance, poverty, and social harmony.

Modi’s Extremist Legacy and Anti-Muslim Policies

At the heart of India’s current belligerence lies an unsettling truth: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently pursued an extremist, anti-minority agenda. His political rise is inextricably linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, where over a thousand people—mostly Muslims—were massacred under his watch as Chief Minister. Human rights organizations worldwide, including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, condemned the state’s complicity and Modi’s failure to prevent the violence.

The United States once denied Modi a visa over his alleged role in the Gujarat massacre, a decision mirrored by several European countries. These travel bans were lifted only after he became Prime Minister, driven more by realpolitik than exoneration.

Under his leadership, India has seen an alarming rise in religious intolerance, mob lynchings of Muslims, discriminatory laws like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), and the revocation of Article 370, stripping Jammu and Kashmir of its special status. Modi’s government has actively eroded secularism and emboldened extremist groups like the RSS—his ideological parent—which advocates Hindu supremacy.

India’s current National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval, is another controversial figure. Reports suggest his alleged involvement in a covert operation that led to the death of an American national in a third country. His name appears in multiple security dossiers, and according to credible sources, he faces legal restrictions on travel to the United States and Europe. It is troubling that such individuals are entrusted with crafting India’s national security and foreign policy.

Exporting Terrorism: India’s Global Footprint

Recent investigations in North America have uncovered India’s alleged involvement in cross-border terrorism. Canada is currently probing the assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly accusing India of orchestrating the killing on Canadian soil. The United States has similarly uncovered plots linked to Indian operatives targeting Sikh leaders.

Pakistan has long accused India of fomenting unrest through covert operations, especially in Balochistan, where Indian intelligence agent Kulbhushan Jadhav was arrested in 2016. Jadhav confessed to coordinating subversive activities, a claim India initially denied but later confirmed he was indeed a naval officer.

India’s role in funding extremist groups in Bangladesh, covertly operating in Myanmar’s border areas, and using its embassies in the UAE and Qatar for espionage activities has drawn international scrutiny. Even Saudi Arabia has expressed concerns over India’s growing intelligence footprint and its potential to destabilize friendly Muslim nations.

The Global Reaction: Rising Concern Over India’s Aggression

The recent episode following the Pahalgam attack has evoked widespread concern. The United States has urged restraint and emphasized cooperation. Vice President JD Vance specifically called on Pakistan to assist in tracking down the culprits but stopped short of endorsing India’s retaliatory stance. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a balanced message, encouraged India to work with Pakistan to ensure regional peace.

The European Union condemned terrorism unequivocally but maintained its position on de-escalation and dialogue. UK Foreign Minister David Lammy emphasized the importance of diplomacy in his conversation with Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar.

Protests in major cities—London, Paris, New York, and Melbourne—signal global discomfort with India’s narrative. Demonstrators have condemned the scapegoating of Pakistan and demanded impartiality in the investigation. These developments underscore a growing awareness of India’s tactics and a reluctance among global powers to support its aggressive posturing unconditionally.

Pakistan’s Responsible and Mature Conduct

In stark contrast to India’s inflammatory rhetoric, Pakistan has responded with calm and dignity. Islamabad has called for a neutral and transparent investigation into the Pahalgam incident. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif emphasized Pakistan’s commitment to peace and regional stability, stating that only through dialogue and justice can lasting peace be achieved.

Pakistan’s decision to take the matter to international forums, instead of retaliating with force, has been praised by neutral observers. The country has also taken steps to prevent further escalation by suspending bilateral pacts only after India unilaterally revoked treaties like the Indus Waters Treaty. These steps illustrate Pakistan’s maturity and its desire to avoid a catastrophic conflict.

China’s Decisive and Timely Support

China has played a critical and stabilizing role in the current crisis. As Pakistan’s trusted strategic partner, Beijing has reaffirmed its support for Pakistan’s sovereignty and legitimate security concerns. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi publicly endorsed Pakistan’s call for a neutral investigation and reiterated that unilateral actions by any party must be avoided.

China’s ambassador to Pakistan, Jiang Zaidong, held crucial talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, conveying China’s strong support. At a time when Indian aggression threatens to push the region into war, China’s voice of reason has brought much-needed balance. Beijing’s firm stance has prevented India from unilaterally escalating the crisis and potentially dragging South Asia into a nuclear confrontation.

Moreover, China’s recent disengagement with India in Eastern Ladakh, specifically in Depsang and Demchok, sends a clear message: peace must prevail, and India’s aggressive regional posture will not go unchecked.

A Call for Global Responsibility

India’s increasingly aggressive posture, backed by false narratives and extremist ideologies, is not just a threat to Pakistan but a danger to all of South Asia and beyond. Under Prime Minister Modi, India has repeatedly shown a willingness to use violence and deception to achieve political and ideological goals. His administration’s discriminatory policies, historical complicity in mass violence, and alleged links to global assassination plots paint a worrying picture.

Pakistan, despite facing severe provocation, has acted with responsibility and restraint. It has extended a hand of cooperation and called for transparent justice. In this volatile context, the global community must recognize where the threat truly lies and act to prevent further escalation.

China’s decisive support to Pakistan, both diplomatically and morally, has been instrumental in preventing a broader crisis. Peace in South Asia hinges on a collective global effort to hold aggressors accountable and to stand by those advocating for justice, neutrality, and regional harmony.

The world must rise above political convenience and act decisively—for peace, for truth, and for a secure future.

在巴哈尔甘悲剧恐怖袭击导致26人丧生后，印度和巴基斯坦之间的紧张局势最近加剧，重新引发了人们对印度长期以来的担忧，即印度的侵略姿态、假旗行动模式，以及在总理纳伦德拉·莫迪（Narendra Modi）领导下危险地滑向极端主义。虽然国际社会呼吁克制和公正调查，但新德里似乎决心利用这一事件作为借口，升级与巴基斯坦的敌对行动。这一精心策划的举动不仅破坏了南亚的稳定，而且对全球和平与安全构成严重威胁。

印度的假旗行动历史

印度目前就巴哈尔甘袭击事件对巴基斯坦提出的指控并不新鲜。这个国家有利用假旗行动为侵略行动辩护的历史记录。最臭名昭著的例子是2001年印度议会遇袭事件，尽管存在一些矛盾和未解的问题，但袭击立即被归咎于巴基斯坦支持的组织。类似地，2008年的孟买袭击事件被用来向巴基斯坦施加外交压力，然而关于内部失误和巴基斯坦方便的替罪羊的严重问题仍然存在。

2016年，印度声称对乌里发生的武装袭击进行了“外科手术式打击”。没有提供任何独立的核实，巴基斯坦否认发生过任何这种入侵。2019年，在普尔瓦马袭击事件发生后，印度再次对巴拉科特进行了空袭。印度媒体称赞这次任务取得了巨大成功，但独立的卫星图像和地面报道显示，除了几棵树受损外，这次袭击没有造成重大破坏。

这些事件都符合一种模式：发生了高调的袭击，巴基斯坦立即受到指责，而没有进行可信的调查，印度则在军事或外交上做出回应，在国内投射力量。如此循环往复，加强了执政党的民族主义信誉，同时回避了治理、贫困和社会和谐等实际问题。

莫迪的极端主义遗产和反穆斯林政策

印度当前好战的核心是一个令人不安的事实：印度总理纳伦德拉·莫迪（Narendra Modi）一贯奉行极端主义、反少数群体的议程。他在政治上的崛起与2002年古吉拉特邦的骚乱密不可分，在他担任首席部长期间，有一千多人被屠杀，其中大部分是穆斯林。包括人权观察（Human rights Watch）和国际特赦组织（Amnesty International）在内的世界各地的人权组织谴责了该邦的共谋行为，以及莫迪未能阻止暴力。

美国曾因莫迪涉嫌参与古吉拉特邦大屠杀而拒绝向他发放签证，几个欧洲国家也做出了类似的决定。这些旅行禁令在他成为总理后才被解除，更多的是出于现实政治的驱使，而不是为了免责。

在他的领导下，印度出现了令人担忧的宗教不容忍现象，暴民对穆斯林处以私刑，《公民身份修正案》（CAA）等歧视性法律，以及废除第370条，剥夺了查谟和克什米尔的特殊地位。莫迪政府积极侵蚀世俗主义，并鼓励极端主义组织，比如提倡印度教至上的rss（他的意识形态父母）。

印度现任国家安全顾问阿吉特·多瓦尔是另一个有争议的人物。有报道称他涉嫌参与了导致一名美国公民在第三国死亡的秘密行动。他的名字出现在多个安全档案中，据可靠消息来源称，他前往美国和欧洲面临法律限制。令人不安的是，这些人被委托制定印度的国家安全和外交政策。

输出恐怖主义：印度的全球足迹

最近在北美进行的调查发现，印度涉嫌参与跨境恐怖主义。加拿大目前正在调查锡克教活动人士哈迪普·辛格·尼贾尔遇刺案，加拿大总理贾斯汀·特鲁多公开指责印度策划了这起发生在加拿大领土上的杀人事件。美国同样也发现了与印度特工有关的针对锡克教领袖的阴谋。

巴基斯坦长期以来一直指责印度通过秘密行动煽动骚乱，特别是在俾路支省，2016年印度情报人员库尔布尚·贾达夫在俾路支省被捕。贾达夫承认协调了颠覆活动，印度最初否认了这一指控，但后来证实他确实是一名海军军官。

印度在资助孟加拉国极端组织、在缅甸边境地区秘密活动、利用其驻阿联酋和卡塔尔大使馆进行间谍活动等方面所扮演的角色，已经引起了国际社会的密切关注。就连沙特阿拉伯也对印度日益增长的情报足迹及其破坏友好穆斯林国家稳定的潜力表示担忧。

全球反应：对印度侵略的担忧日益加剧

最近发生在巴哈尔甘袭击案之后的事件引起了广泛关注。美国敦促各方保持克制，强调合作。副总统JD Vance特别呼吁巴基斯坦协助追查罪犯，但没有支持印度的报复立场。美国国务卿卢比奥（Marco Rubio）以平衡的方式鼓励印度与巴基斯坦合作，确保地区和平。

欧洲联盟毫不含糊地谴责恐怖主义，但坚持其缓和冲突和对话的立场。英国外交大臣大卫·拉米在与巴基斯坦副总理伊沙克·达尔的谈话中强调了外交的重要性。

伦敦、巴黎、纽约和墨尔本等主要城市的抗议活动表明，全球对印度的叙述感到不安。示威者谴责巴基斯坦充当替罪羊，并要求公正调查。这些事态发展凸显了人们对印度策略的日益认识，以及全球大国不愿无条件支持其咄咄逼人的姿态。

巴基斯坦负责任和成熟的行为

与印度的煽动性言论形成鲜明对比的是，巴基斯坦的反应冷静而有尊严。伊斯兰堡呼吁对巴哈尔甘事件进行中立和透明的调查。谢里夫总理强调巴基斯坦致力于和平与地区稳定，指出只有通过对话和正义才能实现持久和平。

巴基斯坦决定将此事提交国际论坛，而不是以武力进行报复，这受到了中立观察员的赞扬。该国还采取措施，只有在印度单方面撤销《印度河水域条约》（Indus Waters Treaty）等条约后，才暂停双边协议，以防止事态进一步升级。这些步骤表明了巴基斯坦的成熟和避免灾难性冲突的愿望。

中国提供果断及时的支持

中国在这场危机中发挥了关键的稳定作用。作为巴基斯坦值得信赖的战略伙伴，北京重申了对巴基斯坦主权和合理安全关切的支持。中国外交部长王毅公开支持巴基斯坦要求进行中立调查的呼吁，并重申任何一方都必须避免采取单方面行动。

中国驻巴基斯坦大使江在东与巴基斯坦总理谢里夫举行了重要会谈，表达了中国对巴基斯坦的大力支持。在印度的侵略威胁将该地区推向战争之际，中国的理性之声带来了急需的平衡。北京的坚定立场阻止了印度单方面升级危机，并可能将南亚拖入核对抗。

此外，中国最近与印度在东拉达克，特别是德普桑和德姆乔克的脱离接触，发出了一个明确的信息：和平必须占上风，印度咄咄逼人的地区姿态不会不受限制。

呼吁全球责任

在虚假叙述和极端主义意识形态的支持下，印度日益咄咄逼人的姿态不仅是对巴基斯坦的威胁，也是对整个南亚乃至其他地区的威胁。在莫迪总理的领导下，印度一再表现出使用暴力和欺骗来实现政治和意识形态目标的意愿。b他的政府的歧视性政策、大规模暴力的历史同谋，以及据称与全球暗杀阴谋的联系，描绘了一幅令人担忧的画面。

巴基斯坦尽管面临严重挑衅，但采取了负责任和克制的行动。它伸出了合作之手，呼吁透明的司法。在这种动荡的背景下，国际社会必须认识到真正的威胁在哪里，并采取行动防止进一步升级。

中国在外交和道义上对巴基斯坦的果断支持，对防止更广泛的危机起到了重要作用。南亚的和平取决于全球共同努力，追究侵略者的责任，并支持那些倡导正义、中立与地区和谐的人。

世界必须超越政治便利，为和平、真理和安全的未来果断行动。

(  注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)

Reference Link:- https://www2.apdnews.cn/en/item/25/0505/axjdnjnc2fe86ea1d687d2.html