（下边有中文翻译请继续看到底。 谢谢。）
For decades, American influence rested not only on its economic and military might but also on a reputation for reliability. Allies and partners may have disagreed with Washington on specific issues, but they trusted U.S. leadership to remain broadly consistent, collaborative, and respectful of international norms. Today, that reputation is under strain. A series of policies, pronouncements, and dramatic gestures under President Trump has left the United States increasingly isolated — not only from adversaries, but from allies who once stood firmly by its side.
Gaza and the Palestine Question
Nowhere is this shift more visible than in the Middle East. The devastation in Gaza has provoked outrage across the world. Human-rights organizations and UN experts have warned of mass suffering, with accusations that Israel’s actions amount to genocide. Instead of responding with balance, Washington has repeatedly used its veto power at the United Nations to block ceasefire resolutions and shield Israel from censure.
The result is a collapse of U.S. credibility. Protests and rallies in Europe, Canada, Australia, and beyond highlight how public opinion has decisively turned. Several governments, including Canada, have already announced their decision to recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. This signals not only a moral rebuke of Israeli policies but also a diplomatic rejection of America’s role as chief arbiter in the conflict.
President Trump’s own words have deepened the divide. His proposal to “redevelop” Gaza into a resort zone of luxury hotels and beaches, coupled with talk of permanently relocating its population, has been condemned internationally as an affront to Palestinian rights. These ideas reinforce the perception that Washington treats human suffering as an opportunity for business ventures rather than a call for justice.
Strains with Europe
The alienation is not confined to the Middle East. In Europe, frustration is growing over Washington’s handling of Ukraine. While European governments have borne heavy costs to sustain Kyiv, President Trump has floated the idea of cutting a deal with Moscow on Russian terms. His suggestion that such a move could end the war — and perhaps win him a Nobel Peace Prize — has alarmed allies, who see it as a willingness to compromise Ukrainian sovereignty and Europe’s long-term security.
Even more damaging are Trump’s repeated remarks questioning NATO’s mutual defense commitments. By openly warning that allies who “do not pay enough” might be abandoned, he has undermined the alliance’s credibility and emboldened its adversaries. These statements have accelerated Europe’s push for “strategic autonomy,” reflecting a new belief that the U.S. may not be a dependable partner.
Trade Wars and Tariffs
Trade policy is another arena where Washington has burned bridges. President Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, and a wide range of imports have disrupted global supply chains and angered partners across Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Retaliatory tariffs have reshaped trading routes, forcing countries to deepen ties with China, the EU, and regional blocs in search of stability.
What began as a tactic to pressure adversaries has ended up straining relations with friends. For many governments, America is no longer the anchor of an open global trading order but a source of volatility.
Disrespectful Gestures
Compounding the problem are the President’s offhand remarks, which many allies interpret as disrespectful. His suggestion that Canada should become the “51st state,” his revived proposal to purchase Greenland, and his transactional rhetoric toward neighbors all convey disregard for the sovereignty of allied nations. These are not harmless jokes — they leave lasting scars on diplomatic relationships.
A Pattern of Estrangement
What matters is not any single policy but the cumulative pattern: unilateral moves in the Middle East, unpredictable trade wars, transactional security guarantees, and cavalier remarks about allies’ sovereignty. Together, they push governments to hedge against U.S. influence. We see this in Europe’s cautious distancing, in Canada and others’ recognition of Palestine, and in the growing willingness of countries to defy Washington in multilateral forums.
The United States is not yet isolated in a literal sense. Its military and economic weight still guarantee influence. But isolation is not an on-off switch; it is a trajectory. Every time Washington alienates allies, it erodes the cooperative foundation of its global leadership. Each veto at the UN, each tariff escalation, each reckless remark makes it easier for partners to look elsewhere.
The Way Forward
If America wishes to sustain its role as a global leader, it must rebuild trust. That requires returning to predictable diplomacy, respecting allies’ sovereignty, adopting a cooperative trade posture, and speaking with the dignity expected of a superpower. Grandstanding may generate headlines, but it corrodes partnerships.
The past two years have shown what happens when foreign policy becomes driven by spectacle and unilateralism: estrangement, protest, and shifting alliances. Unless Washington recalibrates, the United States risks pushing itself into a form of global isolation unprecedented in the modern era.
几十年来，美国的影响力不仅依赖于其经济和军事实力，还依赖于可靠的声誉。盟国和合作伙伴可能在具体问题上与华盛顿有分歧，但他们相信美国的领导将保持广泛的一致性、合作性和对国际准则的尊重。如今，这种声誉正面临压力。特朗普总统领导下的一系列政策、声明和戏剧性姿态使美国越来越孤立——不仅被对手孤立，也被曾经坚定站在美国一边的盟友孤立。
加沙和巴勒斯坦问题
这种转变在中东表现得最为明显。加沙的破坏引发了全世界的愤怒。人权组织和联合国专家警告说，大规模的苦难，并指责以色列的行为相当于种族灭绝。华盛顿没有做出平衡的回应，而是一再使用其在联合国的否决权来阻止停火决议，并保护以色列免受谴责。
其结果是美国信誉的崩溃。欧洲、加拿大、澳大利亚等地的抗议和集会凸显了公众舆论是如何果断转变的。包括加拿大在内的几个国家政府已经宣布了承认巴勒斯坦为主权国家的决定。这不仅是对以色列政策的道德谴责，也是对美国在冲突中充当主要仲裁者角色的外交拒绝。
特朗普总统自己的话加深了分歧。他提议将加沙“重新开发”成一个拥有豪华酒店和海滩的度假区，并讨论永久迁移加沙人口，这一提议被国际社会谴责为对巴勒斯坦人权利的侮辱。这些想法强化了一种看法，即华盛顿将人类的苦难视为商业投资的机会，而不是对正义的呼吁。
与欧洲关系紧张
这种异化并不局限于中东。在欧洲，人们对华盛顿处理乌克兰问题的方式越来越失望。虽然欧洲各国政府为维持基辅付出了沉重代价，但特朗普总统提出了按照俄罗斯的条件与莫斯科达成协议的想法。他暗示，这样的举动可能会结束战争——或许还会为他赢得诺贝尔和平奖——这让盟友们感到震惊，他们认为这是一种愿意牺牲乌克兰主权和欧洲长期安全的意愿。
更具破坏性的是特朗普一再质疑北约共同防御承诺的言论。他公开警告说，那些“付出不够”的盟友可能会被抛弃，这损害了北约的信誉，并让它的对手胆大妄为。这些声明加速了欧洲对“战略自主”的推动，反映出一种新的信念，即美国可能不是一个可靠的合作伙伴。
贸易战与关税
贸易政策是华盛顿破釜釜铁的另一个领域。特朗普总统对钢铁、铝和各种进口产品征收的关税扰乱了全球供应链，激怒了亚洲、欧洲和美洲的合作伙伴。报复性关税重塑了贸易路线，迫使各国深化与中国、欧盟和地区集团的关系，以寻求稳定。
起初作为向对手施压的一种策略，最终导致了与朋友关系的紧张。对许多政府来说，美国不再是开放的全球贸易秩序的支柱，而是动荡的源头。
无礼的手势
令问题更加复杂的是，总统的随意言论被许多盟友解读为不尊重。他建议加拿大应该成为“第51个州”，他重新提出购买格陵兰岛，以及他对邻国的交易性言论，都表明他无视盟国的主权。这些并非无害的玩笑——它们会在外交关系上留下持久的伤疤。
一种疏远的模式
重要的不是任何一项政策，而是累积的模式：中东的单边行动、不可预测的贸易战、交易性的安全保障、对盟友主权的傲慢言论。它们共同推动各国政府对冲美国的影响力。我们从欧洲谨慎的疏远、加拿大和其他国家对巴勒斯坦的承认，以及越来越多的国家在多边论坛上反抗华盛顿的意愿中看到了这一点。
从字面意义上讲，美国还没有被孤立。它的军事和经济实力仍然保证了影响力。但隔离并不是一个开关；这是一个轨迹。每当华盛顿疏远盟友，它就会侵蚀其全球领导地位的合作基础。在联合国的每一次否决，每一次关税升级，每一次鲁莽的言论，都让伙伴们更容易把目光投向别处。
未来之路
如果美国希望维持其全球领导者的角色，就必须重建信任。这需要回归可预测的外交，尊重盟友的主权，采取合作的贸易姿态，并以超级大国应有的尊严说话。哗众取宠可能会成为头条新闻，但它会腐蚀伙伴关系。
过去两年已经表明，当外交政策被奇观和单边主义所驱动时，会发生什么：疏远、抗议和不断变化的联盟。除非华盛顿重新调整，否则美国有可能将自己推向现代前所未有的全球孤立状态。
( 注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)
Reference Link:- https://www.globalresearch.ca/america-risk-global-isolation-president-trump/5900028