（下边有中文翻译请继续看到底。 谢谢。）
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent visit to Washington, D.C., for a much-anticipated meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, was widely viewed—especially in Tel Aviv—as a critical opportunity to reinvigorate the Israeli-American partnership and secure fresh American backing for Israel’s aggressive regional policies. However, contrary to Netanyahu’s expectations, the meeting turned out to be more of a diplomatic cold shower than a warm reunion of strategic allies.
In stark contrast to Netanyahu’s ambitious agenda, Trump offered little more than polite deflection, gentle rebukes, and, in some cases, outright denials of Israeli demands. The Israeli press has already begun acknowledging that the visit did not yield the breakthroughs Netanyahu had hoped for. The right-wing Israel Hayom, known for its strong support for Netanyahu, cautiously admitted that the meeting “fell short of strategic alignment.” Meanwhile, Haaretz, Israel’s leading liberal newspaper, was more direct, reporting that “Netanyahu was told, not asked” on several key regional issues.
A Laundry List of Unrealized Demands
Netanyahu’s visit came at a time when he faces growing international criticism, domestic legal troubles, and deepening political isolation. His agenda in Washington reportedly included seeking Trump’s support for a possible Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, a green light for further military action in Syria, carte blanche for continued operations in Gaza and the West Bank, increased diplomatic confrontation with Turkey, and even tariff concessions on certain Israeli exports.
Yet on nearly every front, Trump offered little more than vague reassurances and outright refusals.
Iran: A Diplomatic Blow
Netanyahu’s most pressing—and most predictable—demand was a renewed aggressive posture toward Iran. According to sources close to the matter, Netanyahu hoped to secure at least rhetorical support from Trump for Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, something he has long considered a personal mission.
Instead, Trump delivered an unexpected message: the United States is in direct communication with Iran and is exploring diplomatic pathways to de-escalate regional tensions. According to the New York Times, Trump reportedly told Netanyahu that “America wants to avoid a broader Middle Eastern war.” This revelation was a major setback for the Israeli leader, whose entire career has been defined by a hawkish stance on Iran.
Gaza and the West Bank: Time for Peace
Another major disappointment for Netanyahu came when the discussion turned to Palestine. Expecting Trump to provide cover for Israel’s recent escalations in Gaza and aggressive settlement policies in the West Bank, Netanyahu was instead urged to return to the negotiating table. Trump reportedly emphasized the importance of a long-term peace deal with the Palestinians and even hinted that Israel’s current path is “unsustainable.”
Twenty-Seven Hours: Donald Trump in Israel
According to Axios, Trump told Netanyahu that continuing military assaults on Palestinian territories would further isolate Israel internationally, including among Arab states that recently normalized relations under the Abraham Accords. For Netanyahu, who has repeatedly framed the Palestinians as obstacles to peace, the advice was nothing short of a diplomatic slap in the face.
Syria and Turkey: No Free Hand
Netanyahu also sought Trump’s endorsement for expanded Israeli operations in Syria under the pretext of targeting Iranian militias. However, Trump responded by reaffirming that the U.S. wants a reduced footprint in the region and warned against any action that could trigger a wider regional conflict.
As for Turkey—a longtime rival of Israel—Netanyahu’s attempt to rally Trump against President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was flatly rejected. Trump was reportedly unequivocal in his praise for Erdoğan, calling him “a good man and a friend.” This must have been galling for Netanyahu, whose government has accused Turkey of supporting Hamas and undermining Israeli interests across the region.
Economic Aspirations Thwarted
Netanyahu’s final appeal during the visit was economic. With Israel facing the risk of U.S. tariffs on select exports, he pressed Trump for exemptions and trade concessions. Trump’s response was reportedly curt: Israel already receives substantial American military and economic aid—currently more than $3.8 billion annually under a decade-long Memorandum of Understanding signed during the Obama administration.
“Israel is getting enough,” Trump allegedly remarked, according to Politico. The implication was clear: Israel should not expect special treatment while other U.S. allies are being asked to carry more of their own burdens.
A Visit That Backfired
Far from gaining strategic advantages, Netanyahu left Washington diplomatically bruised and politically weakened. His image as a strongman capable of bending even superpowers to Israel’s will has taken a hit. Back home, opposition figures were quick to exploit the fallout. Former Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said the visit “revealed Netanyahu’s isolation,” while a columnist in Yedioth Ahronoth wrote that “Netanyahu overplayed his hand—and got nothing in return.”
This sentiment is growing among Israel’s own public. After years of cultivating a close relationship with Trump—especially during the Trump presidency when key pro-Israel moves like the Jerusalem embassy relocation and the Golan Heights recognition occurred—Netanyahu expected unquestioning loyalty. What he received was more of a “shut-up call” than a show of solidarity.
A Greedy and Overambitious Agenda
Netanyahu’s mission was not one of diplomacy but of demands. His expectation that the United States would rubber-stamp his aggressive regional policies, while also showering Israel with economic favors, reflects a broader problem with his leadership: a mix of greed, entitlement, and disregard for international norms.
Despite decades of U.S. support—military, diplomatic, and economic—Netanyahu continues to push an agenda that many see as Zionist expansionism cloaked in security concerns. His government’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank have drawn condemnation from global human rights organizations, and his unwillingness to negotiate with the Palestinians is seen by many as a root cause of regional instability.
Summarizing: A Necessary Setback
In a way, this meeting served as a necessary reset. By refusing to indulge Netanyahu’s maximalist demands, Trump signaled that even Washington’s most privileged allies must now face the consequences of their actions. It was a rare moment of diplomatic sobriety in a relationship often clouded by political pandering.
For Netanyahu, the visit may be remembered not as a triumph of Israeli diplomacy, but as a moment of humiliation. In trying to extract more from an already generous ally, he was reminded that arrogance and overreach have their limits—even in Washington.
The world is changing. And for leaders like Netanyahu, who thrive on division, militarism, and fear, the road ahead may be lonelier than ever.
以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡最近访问华盛顿，与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普举行了备受期待的会晤，这被广泛认为是一个重振以美伙伴关系的关键机会，并确保美国对以色列咄咄逼人的地区政策的新支持，尤其是在特拉维夫。然而，与内塔尼亚胡的预期相反，这次会议更像是一场外交冷水浴，而不是战略盟友的温暖团聚。
与内塔尼亚胡雄心勃勃的议程形成鲜明对比的是，特朗普只是礼貌地转移话题，温和地指责，在某些情况下，还直接否认以色列的要求。以色列媒体已经开始承认，这次访问并没有带来内塔尼亚胡所希望的突破。以强烈支持内塔尼亚胡而闻名的右翼以色列报Hayom谨慎地承认，这次会议“没有达成战略一致”。与此同时，以色列主要的自由派报纸《国土报》（Haaretz）更为直接，报道称在几个关键的地区问题上，“内塔尼亚胡是被告知的，而不是被要求的”。
一长串未实现的需求
内塔尼亚胡的访问正值他面临越来越多的国际批评、国内法律问题和日益加深的政治孤立。据报道，他在华盛顿的议程包括寻求特朗普对以色列可能打击伊朗核基础设施的支持，为在叙利亚进一步采取军事行动开绿灯，全权负责继续在加沙和约旦河西岸的行动，增加与土耳其的外交对抗，甚至对以色列某些出口产品的关税让步。
然而，在几乎每一条战线上，特朗普都只给出了含糊的保证和彻底的拒绝。
伊朗：外交打击
内塔尼亚胡最紧迫、最可预见的要求是对伊朗重新采取咄咄逼人的姿态。据知情人士透露，内塔尼亚胡希望至少从特朗普那里获得口头上的支持，支持以色列空袭伊朗核设施，这是他长期以来一直认为的个人任务。
相反，特朗普传递了一个意想不到的信息：美国正在与伊朗进行直接沟通，并正在探索缓解地区紧张局势的外交途径。据《纽约时报》报道，特朗普告诉内塔尼亚胡，“美国希望避免更广泛的中东战争。”这一消息对这位以色列领导人来说是一个重大挫折，他的整个职业生涯都是以对伊朗的鹰派立场为特征的。
加沙和西岸：是时候实现和平了
另一个令内塔尼亚胡感到失望的是，讨论转向了巴勒斯坦问题。内塔尼亚胡本以为特朗普会为以色列最近在加沙地带的升级和在约旦河西岸咄咄逼人的定居点政策提供掩护，结果却被敦促回到谈判桌。据报道，川普强调了与巴勒斯坦人达成长期和平协议的重要性，甚至暗示以色列目前的道路是“不可持续的”。
27小时：唐纳德·特朗普在以色列
据Axios报道，特朗普告诉内塔尼亚胡，继续对巴勒斯坦领土进行军事攻击将进一步孤立以色列在国际上，包括最近根据亚伯拉罕协议实现关系正常化的阿拉伯国家。对于一再将巴勒斯坦人视为和平障碍的内塔尼亚胡来说，这一建议无异于在外交上打了一记耳光。
叙利亚和土耳其：没有自由
内塔尼亚胡还寻求特朗普支持以色列以打击伊朗民兵为借口扩大在叙利亚的行动。然而，特朗普回应说，美国希望减少在该地区的足迹，并警告不要采取任何可能引发更广泛地区冲突的行动。
至于土耳其——以色列的长期对手——内塔尼亚胡试图联合特朗普反对雷杰普·塔伊普总统Erdoğan，但遭到了断然拒绝。据报道，特朗普毫不含糊地称赞Erdoğan，称他是“一个好人和朋友”。这一定让内塔尼亚胡感到难堪，他的政府指责土耳其支持哈马斯，并在整个地区损害以色列的利益。
经济抱负受挫
内塔尼亚胡在访问期间的最后呼吁是经济方面的。由于以色列面临美国对部分出口产品征收关税的风险，他敦促特朗普给予豁免和贸易让步。据报道，特朗普的回应是简短的：以色列已经获得了大量的美国军事和经济援助——根据奥巴马政府签署的长达十年的谅解备忘录，目前每年超过38亿美元。
“以色列受够了，”据Politico报道，特朗普说。言下之意很清楚：以色列不应该期望得到特殊待遇，而其他美国盟友则被要求承担更多自己的负担。
一次适得其反的访问
内塔尼亚胡非但没有获得战略优势，反而让华盛顿在外交上伤痕累累，在政治上遭到削弱。他的铁腕形象甚至可以使超级大国屈服于以色列的意志，这一形象受到了打击。在国内，反对派人士迅速利用了这一后果。以色列前国防部长本尼·甘茨（Benny Gantz）说，这次访问“暴露了内塔尼亚胡的孤立”，而《新消音报》（Yedioth Ahronoth）的一名专栏作家写道，“内塔尼亚胡玩得过火了，没有得到任何回报。”
这种情绪在以色列自己的公众中也在增长。在与特朗普培养了多年的密切关系之后，尤其是在特朗普担任总统期间，在耶路撒冷大使馆搬迁和承认戈兰高地等亲以色列的关键举措发生时，内塔尼亚胡期待着毫无疑问的忠诚。他得到的更多是“闭嘴”，而不是团结一致的表现。
贪婪和野心过大的议程
内塔尼亚胡的使命不是外交，而是要求。他期望美国在给以色列提供大量经济支持的同时，对他激进的地区政策盖章，这反映了他领导的一个更广泛的问题：贪婪、权利和对国际准则的漠视。
尽管几十年来美国在军事、外交和经济上都给予了支持，但内塔尼亚胡仍在继续推进一项议程，许多人认为这是犹太复国主义在安全考虑的掩护下的扩张主义。他的政府在加沙和约旦河西岸的行动招致了全球人权组织的谴责，他不愿与巴勒斯坦人谈判被许多人视为地区不稳定的根源。
总结：必要的挫折
在某种程度上，这次会议起到了必要的重启作用。特朗普拒绝满足内塔尼亚胡的极端要求，表明即使是华盛顿最特权的盟友现在也必须面对自己行动的后果。在两国关系中，这是一个罕见的外交冷静时刻，两国关系经常被政治迎合蒙上阴影。
对于内塔尼亚胡来说，这次访问可能不会被铭记为以色列外交的胜利，而是一个耻辱的时刻。在试图从一个已经慷慨的盟友那里榨取更多的时候，他被提醒，傲慢和过度扩张是有限度的——即使在华盛顿也是如此。
世界在变化。对于像内塔尼亚胡这样以分裂、军国主义和恐惧为基础的领导人来说，未来的道路可能比以往任何时候都更加孤独。
( 注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)
Reference Link:- https://www.globalresearch.ca/netanyahu-washington-visit-reality-check-president-trump/5884477