{"id":6372,"date":"2024-08-05T05:51:27","date_gmt":"2024-08-05T05:51:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/?p=6372"},"modified":"2024-08-05T05:51:28","modified_gmt":"2024-08-05T05:51:28","slug":"india-has-no-right-to-object-to-pak-china-joint-statement-on-kashmir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/?p=6372","title":{"rendered":"India has no right to object to Pak-China joint statement on Kashmir"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Foreign Office responds to Indian statement questioning Islamabad’s attempts to ‘legitimize illegal occupation’<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday responded to the Indian statement on references made to Jammu and Kashmir in the Pakistan-China joint statement<\/a> issued in Beijing, following talks between Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chinese Premier Li Qiang on June 8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Foreign Office stated, “It is a fact that Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally-recognised disputed territory. The dispute has been on the agenda of the UN Security Council for over seven decades. The relevant Security Council resolutions stipulate that the final disposition of the State of Jammu and Kashmir will be made by the will of the people expressed through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations. In that backdrop, the Indian claims over Jammu and Kashmir are unfounded and misplaced.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

India had rejected \u201cunwarranted\u201d references to Jammu and Kashmir in the joint statement last week and criticized the mention of projects under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), saying that New Delhi rejects any move to legitimize Islamabad\u2019s illegal occupation of territory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more: Indian police accuse Pakistan of instigating violence in IIOJK that killed 12<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe have noted unwarranted references to Jammu and Kashmir in the joint statement between China and Pakistan. We categorically reject such references,\u201d External Affairs Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal had said. \u201cThe Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have been, are, and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While responding a week later, the FO spokesperson asserted that India should not mislead the international community on CPEC, which is a flagship developmental endeavor, agreed upon by two sovereign nations. “Instead of making baseless claims about CPEC, India should implement, at the earliest, the relevant UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir,\u201d she maintained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The joint statement from June 8 read that Pakistan briefed China on the latest developments in Jammu and Kashmir, adding that the Chinese leadership reiterated that the \u201cJammu and Kashmir dispute is left over from history, and should be properly and peacefully resolved\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Source:- https:\/\/tribune.com.pk\/story\/2472419\/india-has-no-right-to-object-to-pak-china-joint-statement-on-kashmir-fo<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Foreign Office responds to Indian statement questioning Islamabad’s attempts to ‘legitimize illegal occupation’ The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday responded to the Indian statement on references made to Jammu and Kashmir in the Pakistan-China joint statement issued in Beijing, following talks between Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chinese Premier Li Qiang on June 8. The Foreign […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[105,39,45,2305,36,2306,2307],"class_list":["post-6372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sample-category","tag-geopolitics-2","tag-india","tag-kashmir","tag-mofa","tag-pakistan","tag-spokesperson","tag-china-3"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6374,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6372\/revisions\/6374"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gsrra.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}